SUBJECT>Re: Not a lie.
POSTER>Ratboy
EMAIL>ratboy@flash.net
DATE>July 07, 1997 at 15:25:02
EMAILNOTICES>no
PREVIOUS>2682
NEXT>
LINKNAME>
LINKURL>
Please excuse the way I worded that post. It was emotionally motivated. I would never ask the
probes to tell an out and out lie. My Idea was to use verbiage that leads them to believe that we have something they
don't. After all, this was a yank of the chain. If P & H think we have the ability to disable J-probe,
they will be less likely to spend $$$ on another armed probe. More likely to cooperate with us. I felt,
at the time of the post that the ETs would eliminate the J-probe. In retrospect, I realize that a lie of
omission is still a lie. Please excuse my error in judgment. Ratboy