SUBJECT>Re: Zero Analysis (97/7/2) POSTER>Xanthos EMAIL>m.f.g.@usa.net DATE>July 03, 1997 at 03:23:15 EMAILNOTICES>no PREVIOUS>2697 NEXT>2710 LINKNAME> LINKURL>
Hopefully more MARSupials are using this good initiation of a more open discussion
in- & ex-tensively. As I've seen Koala is also trying to collect facts and WSU about ETs,
MNs and others. The Probe Discuss Board isn't a proper place to do so, as these attempts
wander down the board and finally to Archives as new threads arise. I've some idea about
that, but will come later ...
Please find attached my contributions of 0,02 cents to Zero Analyses.
>... they placed Enoch back in his "holding cell" while they dealt with the J-probe. This
>implies to me that we are dealing with a very small number of ET at this location on
>Mars. How many places were there in the Bunkhouse and MessHall that Bette found? 6?
I think they are more of them. I've counted at least five ETs in the ET-Tram. Their tunnel
system is pretty far spread too with a lot of rooms and halls and facilities. The mouth of
Jose's cave and Andrew's cave are 24 miles apart and Andrew reported the middle tunnel
of his cave is running something like 80 miles ahead. The big Gate is also about 150 miles
away and had been controlled by something that looked shortly into the hall, Zachary was
trapped in. There are pretty many beanies around. At least two. And at least there must be
another monitor room as well, as these beanies must have been controlled from somewhere
else and Andrew has been doing undetected now for quite a while ...
>A priority should be setting up the communications equipment from stage 2.
I thought that had been done by Gail at June 23rd. But you are right, she was saying:
"I have been setting up the second transmitter. But Zachary is on his way. Then we can
quickly get this done." but no final confirmation. We should ask for that. One incident
that it is done might be her doubled transmission yesterday. (?)
>How bout setting up the beacon and targets where they'll [H&P-probes] crash?
>Is that too offensive?
In my opinion: certainly !! Crashing them without urgent need would weaken our position
referring to our final objectives. We finally need the whole globe as alley.
>Should we contact ANY of the MNs?
-- Sure, not yet but time will come ...
> it might be necessary to lock out his [Naughton's] ID from the site.
Even if he is clean. With that kind of friends you don't need an enemy anymore. It might be
necessary to check out his [Naughton's] IQ from the side. Let's be aware of his probably
becoming actively helpful by establishing innocently some "helpful" links to the MNs.
>I am a little concerned about security of this site.
Me too !!! Therefore:
!"xK'§3 .. wE$3C%4 .. 5W(oxp) .. =?[]+}~ .. &8//G\\ .. H1!J$%& .. -(|*~{o) ..
/(trz}* .. ghnmi+v .. -::;_;'` .. §$%ai&/ .. B{'}|> ..
HHHk5mH .. T!TlTIT .. E=M*C2 .. RoTZbUa .. deppata ..
N.#.@.
%