I'm fully with you, T-Bird by stating in our vision:
>We are willing to defend our idea of freedom against whomever but in a defensive way.
When we build up a defensible fortress we need tools and tricks and traps to maintain a
save place, where probes, drones robots and facilities are properly protected.
You are saying:
>Unfortunately, others who we encounter might not be as noble.
No reason to trap them and to kill them, but still reason enough to search for a way to
cooperate as far as possible. If their objectives are totally off our intentions, then we
should impede them to launch our ideas of coexistence with the ET's
>If our probes are attacked without provocation, do they have the right (with our
>guidance) to defend themselves?
They even have the right, if they are attacked because they have provoked someone.
What we should be aware off is to assume and predict the MN's as bad guys, because
they are not cooperative on sight, causing that way an avoidable battle, we finally will
loose our trustworthiness referring to the ET's and our home globe.
We only have a mandate by Dilyn's Team, but by no earthbound nation. The MN's have a
mandate of about two billion people, all their nations counted together, and a program in
mind how to proceed further on by launching next landers. To impede them seriously we
need good arguments to do so. One of these arguments is to provide a noble vision.
Thanks a lot for your critical post, T-Bird. I think, the way you did is the best way our
vision should be discussed. Keep on, if you don't agree...
m.f.g.
X