SUBJECT>Re: More than meets the visual input sensor ... (Koala)) POSTER>Taz EMAIL>XO@Team.Andrew DATE>June 04, 1997 at 09:15:18 EMAILNOTICES>no PREVIOUS>2294 NEXT>2297 LINKNAME> LINKURL>


Koala said,
"The reference to seismic activity probably is not related to anything either of them detected. I would have expected all the probes to raise an alarm if any activity actually happened."

Precisely my point. If neither of them detected any seismic activity, and none of the MARSupials asked about seismic activity, then why the comment about seismic activity. Did someone else ask about seismic activity? If so, who? And how come Andrew didn't make comment about the question coming from a different source.

"Signals sent from P&H may have included a backdoor command code ... P&H may be using it to send instructions to the probes with which they are compelled to comply or questions they must
answer."

Valid point! But if this is the case, wouldn't Andrew KNOW that he was answering their questions. His response interrupted a statement he was making. He did not even seem to notice that he was interrupted. I hope this isn't the case, or we may be up the creek without the proverbial paddle.

Taz